Search for: "RE/MAX, LLC v. Argus " Results 1 - 20 of 35
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
RE/MAX FIRST CHOICE, LLC, et al., Defendants. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 9:26 am by Bexis
  Only by changing the subject could Max argue that Toy v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 7:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Monster also largely succeeded in its preemption arguments, despite overrelying on  POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 11:13 am
(New Albany) d/b/a Re/Max Associates of New Albany (Re/Max), appeals the trial court's order granting appellee-defendant Karen Hupp's motion for summary judgment on New Albany's complaint against Hupp. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 10:21 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
"In Max India, the counsel argued that an application for interim measures did lie while in this case, he contended otherwise. [read post]
17 May 2021, 4:38 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Judicial Estoppel “Under the doctrine of judicial estoppel, also known as estoppel against inconsistent positions, a party may not take a position in a legal proceeding that is contrary to a position he or she took in a prior proceeding, simply because his or her interests have changed” (Re/Max of New York, Inc. v Weber, 177 AD3d 910 [2d Dept 2019] [quotations omitted]). [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 4:37 am by SHG
  Is it a de minimis extension of the stop, taking two seconds max? [read post]